Tag Archive for Entertainment

X Factor – Auditions Week 1

Well for those who are avid X Factor viewers the show is now underway in it’s latest incarnation. Week 1 of the auditions has seen some highs and lows and raised a few points about the impartiality of the show.

It has been reported that with the addition of Gary Barlow Simon Cowell is now dead as far as the X Factor goes. Whilst Cowell may appear dead from the neck up due to so much botox, the reality is quite different. Despite reports that Gary Barlow has taken on Simons mantle, Gary and Kelly are also reportedly getting advice from beyond the grave from the said Mr Cowell. It would make a great Hollywood horror movie as if he is dead as far as the X Factor is concerned the late Mr Cowell is it seems still the puppet master. It would seem that rumours of his demise may have been premature. It also makes me wonder that if the puppet master cut the strings would Gary and Kelly collapse like broken toys, only time will truly tell.

Taking a look at the new format with auditions in front of an audience and the use of technology, are we getting an accurate picture of talent? Before auditions were private, so no potential for influence from outside. Those auditioning did so without the use of technology such as radio microphones, mixing desks, backing tracks and professional sound engineers. With all the technology being used are we also seeing auto-tune? Is what we see a true representation or is it already manufactured at the audition stages? These are questions that may radically change how the X Factor is viewed for fairness. The hopefuls now even have dressing room facilities laid on.

Having watched the first auditions program I have to admit to being a little unimpressed in many ways. Much hype is being given to a few of those who made it through, and little to others. This to me is already establishing a two tier system. It almost screams, producers favourites and the publicity will only heighten the status of those few in the public perception, meaning they are more likely to go further. One thing the X Factor has been very good at over the years is influencing the public and to a degree the public vote. It was not having that control with Wagner in 2010 that caused the double elimination so that they could regain it.

So what did I think of the acts that were given the lions share of attention by the producers which is ultimately seized on by the media.

Frankie Cocozza

Frankie Cocozza X Factor 2011What did I make of Frankie? Well to be honest … not a lot. I have heard as good at a karaoke night before. Yes he was better than some but the selection we saw due to editing didn’t really give us a true picture of the other talent on display. Frankie to me epitomises the youth of today and the cult of fame. Ask a child what they want to be and it is a good chance you’ll get the reply … famous. Like many of today’s youth he sees fame as a right and feels that he is due success by right. He wants the glory, cars and to be sexually irresponsible knowing that if he makes it someone will be there to clean up whatever mess he makes. He sees fame as a right whereas it should be a privilege. Yes some of it is hype for the purposes of publicity, but to my mind there are better and more deserving acts out there.

Goldie Cheung

Goldie Cheung X Factor 2011So Goldie has joined other hopefuls at the X Factor boot camp. I have to admit having watched her perform I am forced to ask why? Perhaps it is just to try and liven things up because it cannot be due to talent. Gary Barlow was right to say NO. He was however the only voice of sanity on the panel. Were the others given instructions by producers to let Goldie through? Her vocal performance was at best bad and no amount of coaching at boot camp will improve it, as for the rest of her “Stage Presence” I was left wondering when the ping pong balls were going to start flying. She may be a tai chi instructor from what is now Chinese Hong Kong but it was more an act for a cheap thai bar than for the X Factor. God help those at boot camp.

Kitty Brucknell

Kitty Brucknell X Factor aka Kimberly DayleBefore being seen auditioning on stage Kitty was being interviewed and in passing mentioned choreographers and producers she likes to work with. Now the X Factor is supposed to be for non professionals, yet Kitty also made reference to being in the entertainment industry with financial remuneration since she was 15. So it would seem that professional entertainers ARE allowed, in fact it is reported that Kitty was requested to audition by the shows production team. So what is Kitty’s story .. well as far as was revealed on the X Factor she is 26 and from Gloucestershire. She is also well known to those within the entertainment industry as Kimberly Dayle and also Kimberly Edwards, who has been a Britney Spears and Christina Aguilera Tribute act for many years and who now also does a Lady Gaga Tribute. The web site under clients also lists Sony which some might perceive as a conflict of interest from the music giant with whom the X Factor is linked, is 2010 beginning to appear all over again. Anyone who knows Kitty/Kimberly knows how good a voice she has, and that she is talented, to dispute such would be foolish, and her acapella showed her range, passion and microphone ability. She’s no stranger to TV, having made appearances on MTV, Sky TV, BBC, ITV,  Channel 4, The Travel Channel, Channel 10 Australia, among others, as well as  featuring in the top documentary “Britney Spears Saved My Life” made by Oscar  winning director Vikram Jayanti. Until being approached by the shows producers who had seen video footage of her Kitty/Kimberly had had no intention of entering the show.

Kitty Brucknell aka Kimberly Dayle As Britney Spears

Kitty Brucknell aka Kimberly Dayle As Britney Spears

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Janet Devlin

Janet devlin X FactorShe is a young 16 year old from a little town in Omagh Northern Ireland. She wowed the judges with her rendition of “Your Song” …… but does she have the X Factor? Janet comes across as the innocent teen who is taking her first steps in the outside world. She has a naivety born of that innocence that music companies love to eat up and spoon feed and mould into a product. Her audition in many ways was unremarkable, to me her voice is average, at times her pitch was a little off, her Irish accent comes through like a lighthouse beam on a dark night and her diction / pronunciation could be clearer. Being young she has potential and can with the right tuition train her voice although we will have to wait to see if it develops the power it will also need. She reminds me of a young Bonnie Langford when I look at her, the hair colour is different but they both share similar features and that innocent clean look, I just hope she doesn’t have to grow up too fast to keep pace with her fellow contestants.

Roxy Yarnold

Roxy Yarnold aka Roxanne YarnoldRoxy a 19 year old pizza maker from Essex. She wowed the judges with her rendition of ” Georgia On My Mind”. In what little we saw she had a voice filled with power and passion, a great voice for a great song. Gary Barlow described Roxy’s voice as Brown Sugar. What we saw of Roxy was very brief so I did a little digging and came up with some more information. The following is all in Roxy’s own words …….

I’m Roxy. I have been singing and performing since I can remember. I have co-written and worked with various songwriters and  producers since the age of 11 and I am now hoping to find the right people to collaborate with!!

Experience

2010

  • The ICMP : Awarded a full Vocal Scholarship after an audition process at the Institute Of Contemporary Music, London, UK
  • Andrew Lloyd Webbers Over the Rainbow : Reached the final 40 (boot camp) on Andrew Lloyd Webbers search for a new Dorothy, London, UK

2009

  • Essex Factor : Awarded First Prize in Essex’s best Songwriter competition ran by Essex County Council, London, UK

2008

  • G4 TOUR : Support act/ warm up act for G4 on the London dates of their tour. This included The Royal Albert Hall, and other venues singing acoustic original and cover songs, London, UK
  • Shayne Ward Tour : Support act/ warm up act for Shayne Ward on his UK/ Ireland Tour. I toured for just over 3 months as an acoustic artist singing original songs and covers and even performed at Wembley., London, UK
  • Westlife Summer Nights Tour : Support act/ warm up act for Westlife on their Summer Nights Tour. I toured for just under 3 months performing in around 15 shows in England., London, UK

What I find intriguing is that not one of the points of who was worked with in 2008 was picked up on at all.

Heshima Thompson

Heshima Thompson X FactorHeshima wowed the judges with Ushers song “Oh My God”, the choice of which may have been a very sound tactical move as Kelly is reported to be getting help from Usher Raymond. We saw a little body popping, slightly reminiscent of the late Michael Jackson and the hair looks like it has been styled on OutKasts Andre 3000. Its the mix and match look of styles, slightly more Next than Primark. So what do we know of this 24 year old. Well he auditioned for the X Factor back in 2009 and went to boot camp but failed the final cut. He has recently starred in Eastenders spin off E20 and he has been a backing singer for the late Amy Winehouse. Yet another hopeful who seems to have a professional pedigree.

SoSo Status

Well I have not yet been able to find out much about these 4 ladies. I am sure information will be forthcoming at some point and so will be keeping my eyes open.

The Talentless Majority

George Gerasimou Untalented UnrealisticAs with all things X Factor we were treated to those without a shred of talent too. Bigged up by friends or family they think that they have what it takes to be a star, however family and friends aren’t always the best judges. We have seen it before and will do so again, people who are rejected and who cannot handle it, spewing verbal abuse and insults to cover their own inadequacies. Tulisa came on the receiving end after George (pictured left) performed Ne-Yo song badly and went walkabout in the audience, only to be brought back by X Factor staff. Whilst annoyed at his comments Tulisa saying that if she wasn’t on the X Factor she would have hit him, sends the wrong signals to today’s youth. People will often say things you don’t like but that is not an excuse for violence and Tulisa should in actions and words set a better example. I am sure she has been called many things and been criticised within her time in the music industry and she should be used to it. IF YOU CAN’T TAKE CRITICISM DON’T ENTER.

Conclusion.

I think it is apparent that there is much professional talent taking part in this years X Factor. I have spoken with ITV and the company behind the X Factor for clarification on eligibility for the show. It seems that the word professional has many meanings and is open to interpretation. The dictionary definition of professional as pertaining to entertainment is as follows:
Expert and specialized knowledge in field which one is practicing professionally
A high standard of professional ethics, behavior and work activities while carrying out one’s profession
Excellent manual/practical skills in relation to profession
Participating for gain or livelihood in an activity or field of endeavor
A professional is an expert who is master in a specific field

On the X Factor though it seems professional means representation by a major and well known management company. Which basically means they can’t sign you up how they want so making you useless. Not so much a widening of goalposts more sticking sticks in the ground on 2 different continents. It makes me realise why many people with brains question the shows validity, and its impartiality. As always though it is your opinions, the readers that count.

© 2011 Paul Sims. CEE Worldwide Entertainment Agency

Is Entertainment Ethical?

I have to admit this is a question I often ponder. In this article I seek to put my thoughts into words, perhaps you may or may not agree with them.

There are many within the entertainment industry that will do whatever it takes to climb the heights of success or to just get bookings. It doesn’t matter if they are a global superstar or John Doe the Singing Milkman. If I am honest for most the world of the superstar is far removed from everyday and everyday is where I wish to concentrate for the most part.

There are a lot of great ethical acts in the entertainment industry who are penalised by the unethical ones. The last few years has seen a change taking place within the entertainment industry, and the rise in popularity of shows like X Factor and Britain’s Got Talent has made everyone feel they can be a star; which is far from the reality. Whilst the numbers of those within the entertainment industry has risen, the number of venues has fallen, creating a wider disparity than originally existed. The market has become flooded and many acts are not of a suitable standard to even be in the industry, yet they remain a part of it why?

Well much of this comes down to ethics. An established act with a pedigree costs a lot more to book, also an established act is more likely to be doing things correctly and ethically which also raises costs. You are probably wondering how being ethical can increase costs and that is what we will look at.

When you book an experienced and ethical act what do you actually get for the money. Well hopefully you get an act that is honest, competent, professional, flexible and experienced, which understands their craft. For that you pay a premium to start. Then there is the ethical side to the equation, which also adds to the costs. A professional act will be insured, have safe equipment, reliable well maintained transport, pay tax, pay national insurance, perhaps dues to professional bodies as well as management and/or agents fees. They will also pay for relevant licences to carry out their profession legally. Not only does the income as an entertainer pay there wages part is also reinvested in updating to newer equipment and/or other aspects of a show. A stage magician has the cost of having new stage tricks constructed.

The unethical acts often use second hand equipment which is poorly maintained, have no insurance, have transport which is unreliable, do not pay tax or national insurance and do not work professionally.

What this means is that the unethical can offer services far cheaper than those who do work ethically. The margins on costs can run into hundreds of pounds and doing things right costs money.

Hiring an unethical act is conning yourself. Why? Well lets take just the taxation issue. Superstars go abroad to avoid taxes so why should others pay them? Here is why.

In today’s economy we all need to contribute, superstars abroad don’t put a strain on services they don’t contribute to. Taxes pay for children’s education, hospitals, and the care of the elderly, roads, policing, and a whole lot more. Those who work unethically in entertainment use those services without contributing, instead those who pay taxes pay for them. Yet venues and the public will book them. Everyone will do the occasional cash in hand off the books gig and I have no problem accepting that. It is the blatant, continued non contribution that frustrates and annoys me.

Booking unethical acts can put people at risk, and if god forbid an accident occurred who will be sued? Most likely the person who made the booking!!!

Ethical acts will also give fair and unbiased advice. They know being honest is important and will always do there best not to mis-inform or mislead. Unethical acts have no problem using any tactics to get bookings.

Few other industries would allow such lax standards or for people to get away with what many do within the entertainment industry. I for one would like to see acts have to show they are tax registered, have PLI, PAT and any other licences required before they can be booked and for it to be a criminal offence to book any act that cannot show the relevant documentation, with substantial fines, not polite warnings.

If all were held to the same basic standards with bookers just paying a premium for experience the playing fields would be a lot leveller and fairer. Of course bookers and venues play their own part in this ethical debate. They think that cheap is a good thing, some venues actively encourage acts to work “off the books” as it were so as to cut costs, so fueling the disparity and encouraging the cutting of corners. You may book cheap entertainment, but as the saying goes You Get What You Pay For. Put on a few cheap rubbish acts and it will kill trade, venues get a name for putting on bad acts so people avoid them, ultimately this can lead to a venue closing due to lack of funds, When that happens the ratio of acts to venues increases again. It is a spiral that just keeps revolving.

We all have a part to play to improve the ethical side of the entertainment industry, and we can all make a concious effort today to do so.

Polls

Please feel free to take part in the polls, the second poll allows the selection of multiple answers.

Do you feel the entertainment industry should have tighter controls?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Divider

Do you think all entertainers should have to meet certain requirements?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

©2011. Paul Sims. All Rights Reserved.

New Features Added To CEE Worldwide Entertainment Agency Blog

With the update and revamping of the blog some some new features we hope visitors will enjoy and which they can take advantage of.

Personal Management Consul

We have added a consul in the sidebar for users of the site to be able to manage their personal details. Once logged in clicking My Profile in the consul will allow you to change any personal details details you need to.

We have also added the ability for registered users to be able to submit articles to the blog therefore becoming an active part of it. This feature can be accessed by clicking Submit Article in the consul. All articles submitted are held for approval and only those we deem fit or of high enough quality will be published.

You can keep track of the staus of a submitted article using the My Posts option on the consul. This will allow you to see which if any posts are pending or published. It also allows you to delete any post you have made, we do not however allow editing of posts as constantly rechecking them would be too time consuming. (If you are looking for an Article Directory to submit articles to we suggest Article Write)

Questions And Answers Section

This new feature can be found by clicking Q & A on the main navigation tab.

This new feature has been created to allow questions relating to the entertainment industry to be asked and for visitors to be able to supply the answers. There are various types of Q & A sites including Ask and Yahoo. This is dedicated to the entertainment industry and we hope people will embrace the idea.

We feel it is a good way for people to seek answers to questions about a specific subject, in this case entertainment, and for those within that industry to respond. Whilst many answers will be individual opinions collectively they can be of great assistance.

We think this is a new and valuable service and resource.

New Look To CEE Worldwide Entertainment Agency Blog

If you have visited the site before you will notice it has a new look. If you haven’t then … Welcome.

So why the new look? Well to be honest as much as I liked the old one it was just that old. I wanted to create something fresher and for it to have its own identity.

If you visited the old blog you will have seen it mimicked certain aspects of our corporate site. A sort of muddled attempt to create some kind of synergy between the two. However it wasn’t great and lacked much of what the corporate site has. So I decided to rethink it and recreate it. I wanted something simple but stylish that would allow me to blog and which visitors would find easy on the eye and relaxing. To that end I have gone for the cool relaxing blues of the corporate site, whites and greys which again link it .. and a little splash of colour in the rusets and beiges to compliment the feel. I think it links in some ways and yet has its own identity.

Creating someting is about not just what i find pleasing it should take into account the visitors to the site.

I hope you like and enjoy visiting the new site and that you will do so often.

Regards,

Paul Sims
CEO
CEE Worldwide Entertainment Agency

The Cost Of Selling Your Digital Music Online.

So you are a band or musical act and would like to sell your music digitally online, in a secure way. The easiest way is to use a digital music distribution site, but what are the potential costs of doing so.

To use as an example we have choosen CD Baby a well known digital music distibution site, and will use its own prices as a demonstration.

Firstly if you wish to sell your music you have to register for a membership account which is similar for most sites of this type. Once registered you can then proceed to upload your music to sell online. The process seems simple enough, and it is. It is why people use these types of service. However, once registered and you want to start uploading you begin to find out the true cost of doing so. Most people do not read the small print or other terms they just sign up, and that as this article will show is a huge mistake.

Above you can see the CD Baby pricing page in the frame, if you cannot see the frame you can always visit the web page. You can see from the page in question that we have not invented any figures etc.

So you have your account and now want to upload some music. You decide to upload say 3 albums of your music, so let us look at the first entry in the pricing table. Album signup is $39.00 per album so 3 albums will cost $117.00 yes $117.00 and you haven’t even sold anything. So you have paid money to upload your music and have paid to do so in the hope of making sales, does this seem right to you? Next say you want to upload 3 single tracks, as an album perhaps contains 10 or more a single track will be free or cost very little, well lets take a look. Looking at the second entry in the pricing chart we see the cost of upload for each single track which is $9.95 per single so your 3 singles will cost, wait for it $29.85 and you haven’t made any sales. So 3 albums and 3 singles have cost you a total of $146.85. I think you will agree that is a reasonable outlay and without a single track sold.

If you then decide you want extras such as a UPC barcode that is another $20.00 per album and $5.00 per single. Those prices soon add up.

So you can see you can spend a lot of money before you have even potentially made a sale. And remember you aren’t guranteed to make any sales at all. So what happens if you make a sale? Well then for each item sold you ALSO pay a commission. Yes more expense, on top of what you have already paid out.

So if we scroll down the page we see the section regarding how much CD Baby pays you. The second box down deals with downloads where it states you get 75% of sale fee which means CD Baby gets 25%. The following is a direct excerpt from that entry “We keep 25% of the purchase price with a minimum of 29 cents. For a download that sells for $9.99 you get paid $7.49, and for a single that sells for 99 cents you get paid 70¢.” Have you noticed that the minimum is 29 cents which means that on a $1.00 download you are actually paying 29% commission if that was a $0.50 sale you would be paying a whopping 58% commission. Yes it really does pay to read the small print and thing about it. On another page completely, click here to view it, they claim “Make the highest profit margin of any online store
Get paid 70¢ for any single you sell for 99¢. For multiple singles transactions, we keep only 25% (minimum 29¢) and pay you a whopping 75% per download sold on our store – more than iTunes, Amazon, and other retailers.” Not completely factual as it is not always 75% due to the minimum charge already mentioned. One other thing to bear in mind is that they claim to pay more than other reatilers in commission, However i doubt they check all the potential competition just the big guns so you can probably find better deals by looking around. New site Music Acts Tracks charges just 20% commission and has a commission price promise too.

So is it easy to find cheaper alternatives. The answer is YES. Music Acts Tracks offers you the ability to do just that. There are no registration charges. There are no upload fees. You just pay 20% commission which is backed by Music acts Tracks commission price promise. It really is that simple.

© Paul Sims 2011